SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 149

G.P.BHUTT, M.HIDAYATULLAH
BISANDAS – Appellant
Versus
NIRMAL KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.L.Halve, G.C.Koshal, R.S.DABIR

G. P. BHUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision has been referred to a larger Bench at the instance of Tare J. before whom it was placed for hearing.

( 2 ) THE revision arises out of civil suit No. 39-A of 1954 which was instituted by the non-applicant Nirmalkumar against the applicants, Bisandas, Tekchand and shcwandas, in the Court of Third Civil Judge, Sagar, for recovery of Rs. 3,400/- on account Settled or alternatively for dissolution and accounts of partnership. After the parties led evidence, suit was fixed for arguments on 15-4-1957. On that date, it was adjourned to 16-4-1957 to allow the parties to prepare arguments. On 154-1957, however, the applicants moved the District Judge, Jabalpur, for transfer of the suit to another Court. On the same date, they sent a telegram to their counsel at Sagar intimating to him that an application for transfer was filed before the district Judge and he should get the suit adjourned. The application for transfer was taken up by the District Judge on 16-4-1957 when he passed an order that the trial Court might hear arguments but should defer delivery of judgment till disposal of the application.

( 3 ) THE trial Court declined to adjourn the suit on 1









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top