SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 144

M.HIDAYATULLAH, G.P.BHUTT
RAMAKANT KESHEORAO – Appellant
Versus
BHIKULAL LAXMICHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SEN, P.R.Padhye, S.C.Soni, Y.S.DHARMADHIKARI

G. P. BHUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter called the Act), which is directed against the order of the election Tribunal, Chhindwara, dismissing the appellant's election petition for declaration that the election of respondent No. 1 to the House of the People from the Chhindwara Parliamentary Constituency was void.

( 2 ) THE election Petition was filed by Lekhram (P. W. 4) who was an elector on the roll of the Chhindwara Parliamentary Constituency from Parasia. The Election tribunal granted him leave under Section 109 of the Act to withdraw the election petition. Thereafter, the appellant, who was respondent No. 6 in the ejection petition, was, on his application under Section 110 (3) (c) of the Act, substituted by the Election Tribunal in his place and allowed to continue the proceedings.

( 3 ) THE Chhindwara Parliamentary Constituency is a double-member constituency, one of the seats being general and the other reserved for a member of the scheduled tribes. Respondents Nos. 1 to 7, respondent No. 11 and the appellant were candidates for the general seat, and respondents Nos. 8 to 10, for the reserved seat

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top