SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 133

A.H.KHAN
STATE – Appellant
Versus
MANSINGHRAO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mungre, Tribhuwan Nath

A. H. KHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff against the State of Madhya Bharat in which he had sought a declaration that his dismissal by the revenue Minister is invalid and that he still continues to be in service. The suit was decreed by the Civil Judge, First Class, Bhind and on appeal the decision was affirmed by the District Judge.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case lie within a short compass: The plaintiff was a Naib tehsildar in year 1940 and was in the service of the Gwalior State. Near about that time, a complaint was filed against him by one Kishanlal. While the enquiry was proceeding, the then Maharaja of Gwalior went on a tour of the Mandsaur District and the matter was placed before him. The then Maharaja of Gwalior reprimanded the plaintiff and issued him a warning by way of punishment. Thereafter he continued to be in service and on two subsequent occasions was promoted to higher grades also. On the formation of Madhya Bharat State, sometime in year 1950, he was served with a notice by the Revenue Minister of madhya Bharat State to show cause why he should not be dismissed from the service in connection with the complaint of Kishanl














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top