SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 124

V.R.SEN, G.P.BHUTT
NETRAM – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMAN PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAMA GUPTA, Y.S.DHARMADHIKARI

SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal and First Appeal No. 18 of 1959 raise common questions for decision. This order shall accordingly dispose of both the appeals.

( 2 ) THESE are appeals under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (herein after called the Act), from the orders of the Election Tribunal, Rajnandgaon, dismissing the election petitions filed by the appellants for declaring the election of the respondents to the Section Legislative Assembly to be void under Section 100 (1) (c) of the Act.

( 3 ) THE present appellant claimed to be an elector on the roll of the Bemetara Constituency. His status as an elector was denied by the respondents before the Tribunal, but was not contested before us. During the last general elections to the State Legislative Assembly, respondent No. 1 was a candidate for the general seat and respondent No. 2, for the reserved seat, of the Bemetara Constituency. One Dhansingh had filed three nomination papers for the general seat of that Constituency, but his nomination was rejected by the Returning Officer. As a result of the poll, the respondents were declared to be duly elected for their respective seats. The case of the appellant was














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top