SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 76

B.K.CHATURVEDI
BHOJRAJ KRISHNARAO – Appellant
Versus
DARSU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SEN, Y.S.DHARMADHIKARI

B. K. CHATURVEDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is second appeal by two plaintiffs, Bhojraj and Narsingh Rao, who filed a suit against several defendants for the recovery of possession of -/-/6 share of the village of Ambhori, Tahsil Multai, along with sir fields and some khudkasht land, situate at Ambhori, and a house. The plaintiffs-appellants averred that they had pin-chased the suit property for Rs. 1,000/-from one Wamanrao, Brahmin, of bhainsdahi. They were ousted from possession by the defendants after getting a decree against them from the Court of the Civil Judge (Class II), Multai, under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act. They, therefore, filed this suit for possession of the suit property.

( 2 ) THE defendants resisted the suit on the main ground that Mst. Radhabai, widow of Bapuji, had executed a perpetual lease in their favour and they had been in possession of the property since 1-11-1917.

( 3 ) THE trial Court granted a decree for possession in favour of the plaintiffs on condition of payment of Rs. 2,135/-by them to the defendants 9 to 14, The defendants 10 to 14 filed an appeal in the Court of the Additional District Judge, betul, against the decision of the trial Court; the oth








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top