T. C. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent Kishanlal had filed an application against the appellant rukmanibai for divorce under Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') in the Court of District Judge Indore. During the pendency of the proceedings, the appellant Rukmanibai filed an application under Section 24 of the Act for maintenance pendente lite and necessary expenses of the proceedings. This application was rejected by the Additional District Judge, indore, on 29-8-1957 on the ground that the advantage of Section 24 of the Act is available only to a petitioner in the main proceedings. Hence this appeal.

( 2 ) SHRI Pande for the respondent has raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the present appeal. He contends that under Section 28 of the act, an appeal against an order rejecting an application under Section 24 is not tenable inasmuch as an appeal lies according to his interpretation of the section, against only those orders which are appealable under the Civil Procedure Code or any other law for the time being in force. He points out that under the Civil procedure Code only the orders mentioned in Section 104 read

Click Here to Read the rest of this document