SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 33

M.HIDAYATULLAH, B.K.CHOUDHURI
K. C. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
ELECTION TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.SETH, S.L.Golcha, S.L.JAIN

( 1 ) THIS petition is by K. C. Sharma who challenges before us an order made by the election Tribunal, Chhatarpur on 7th September, 1957 in election petition No. 270 of 1957. By that order the Election Tribunal partly allowed an application for amendment of particulars in the election petition filed by the present petitioner. By the present petition the petitioner challenges that portion of the order by which amendments sought to be introduced were disallowed.

( 2 ) THE election petition contained allegations of corrupt practices indulged by the returned candidate. It purported to set out particulars of the corrupt practices in three schedules which are numbered, A, B and C. By the application for amendment the petitioner sought to introduce details of the corrupt practices in all the three schedules. Some of these amendments were allowed and the others rejected. It is not necessary to refer to the various amendments which are quite numerous and are not capable of being briefly summarised. We have, however, examined, the original schedules, the proposed amendments and the orders thereon by the election Tribunal carefully. Having considered these amendments and the reasons therefor







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top