SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 198

T.P.NAIK, M.HIDAYATULLAH
RADHAKISAN NARAINDAS – Appellant
Versus
TRILOKCHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SEN, R.P.SINHA, R.S.DABIR

M. HIDAYATULLAH, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the plaintiff against an order refusing a temporary injunction and has been filed under Order 43, Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The matter arises out of a suit for damages and permanent injunction against the respondents-defendants, who, it is alleged, are infringing a registered trade mark of the plaintiff-firm. This trade mark is affixed as a label containing the picture of a rabbit and as tissue paper (jhilli) on the bidis manufactured by the appellant. The trade mark represents the picture of a rabbit (khargosh) with the usual inscription showing who the manufacturers of the bidi are. The impugned label and 'jhilli' represent not to rabbit but a squirrel and the label is described as 'gilhari Chhap'. The tissue paper is printed in the same ink and contains respectively the picture of a khargosh and a gilhari. The inscriptions, however, are different inasmuch as in the impugned jhilli they are in English and are placed in the form of a box around the picture of the gilhari. In the 'jhilli' of the plaintiff-firm a picture of khargosh is enclosed in a scroll and the writing is in hindi.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-firm claims tha








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top