SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 176

V.R.NEWASKAR, T.C.SHRIVASTAVA
MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
FIRM ANDANI CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.M.Chafekar, Vijayavargiya

V. R. NEVASKAR, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal involves consideration of a question regarding limitation.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF Mohammad Hussain Bohara of Sanawad filed this suit for the recovery of Rs. 6800/- on the allegations that the defendant had agreed to sell to him the corrugated iron sheets covering the entire premises of the "merchant Gin' at sanawad which the latter had agreed to purchase from a third party at the rate of annas 3 1/4 per square foot. The contract was entered into on 31-1-1949 and the plaintiff paid Rs. 5000/- towards the contract. The delivery of the sheets was agreed to be given within thirty days. A document containing, these terms was executed between the parties. The defendant, it is said, failed to give delivery as agreed before 3-3-1949 and prayed for the extension of the period for delivery. The plaintiff agreed to the extension by a fortnight. There was further extension by three days subsequent to the date fixed for delivery under the earlier extension up to 1-4-1949. But even then the defendant failed to deliver. Later the defendant, who had contracted to purchase the 'merchant Gin' had his contract of sale cancelled and the said property was sold to a third pa







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top