SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 162

M.HIDAYATULLAH, G.P.BHUTT
SHEORAMPRASAD RAM NARAYANLAL BANIA – Appellant
Versus
GOPALPRASAD PARMESHWARDAYAL SHUKLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.J.BHAVE, R.K.Pandey

G. P. BHUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal of the first defendant, Sheoram Prasad, against the order passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Rajnandgaon, in Civil Suit No. 86 a of 1954, refusing to set aside an award.

( 2 ) FIRM S. S. Gupta Bidi Works, Rajnandgaon, belonged jointly to Mst. Sheodulari, and the first defendant who is her husband's younger brother. Mst. Sheodulari is the wife of the third respondent, Sheogopal and step-mother of the plaintiff sheokumar, respondent 4. The partnership acquired some immoveable properties at Rajnandgaon and other places. By a registered deed ated 27-7-1945, Mst. Sheodulari transferred her interest in the business and the properties to the plaintiff. On 1-12-1948, the plaintiff and the first defendant took Radheshyam, defendant 3, as a partner of -/4/- share in the partnership business, the remaining -/12/- share being owned equally by the plaintiff and the first defendant. The irnmoveable properties continued to be owned by the plaintiff and the defendant 1 exclusively.

( 3 ) DISPUTES having arisen between the plaintiff and defendant 1, they appointed gajanand Prasad, respondent 2, as an arbitrator by a deed of agreement, dated 53-





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top