SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(MP) 129

T.C.SHRIVASTAVA, P.K.TARE
SURAJDIN LAXMANLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.L.JAYAVANT, H.L.KHASKALAM, K.K.DUBEY

SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner challenges the right of the State Government to recover certain amounts from him as arrears of land revenue.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the petition arc as follows. As a result of auction, the petitioner was granted a licence to distil liquor in Kawardha in 1953 and 1954. The amount which the petitioner had to pay to the State Government was Rs. 18,100/-and Rs. 27,000/- respectively for the two years. At the time of the first auction, the State Government had intimated to the bidders that a surcharge or 7 1/2 per cent over the amount of the bid would be charged to all outstill contractors for the privilege to remove fuel and mahua from the Government forest. At the time of the second auction also, a similar condition was announced. Accordingly, the State Government sought to recover Rs. 1357-8-0 for the first year and Rs. 2032-8-0 for the second year from the petitioner. Respondents 2 to 4, who are respectively the Deputy Commissioner, Durg, the Divisional Forest Officer, Durg Division, Rajnandgaon, and the Tahsildar, Kawardha, have threatened to recover the amounts due from the petitioner a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top