SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(MP) 9

S.D.SHRIVASTAVA
IN RE: SHANTILAL AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.L.Dubey

S. D. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge, West Nimar, Mandleshwar, recommending that the order passed by the Magistrate, First Class, Kasrawad, in criminal Case No. 136 of 1957 on April 4, 1958, be set aside and the prosecution be allowed to furnish fresh documents in the course of that trial.

( 2 ) THE material facts are that Shantilal and seven others are being tried by the magistrate, First Class, Kasrawad, who has framed a charge against each of them under Section 147 read with Section 34 I. P. C. With the police report dated October 28, 1957, certain copies were filed under Section 173 Criminal Procedure Code. These copies were supplied to the accused. On December 6, 1957, charges were framed against the accused. On March 20, 1958 the prosecution made an application to the trial Magistrate seeking leave to file two more documents, viz. , (i) application dated April 9, 1957, addressed by Chunnilal (complainant) to the district Superintendent of Police, in connection with this very matter, which was forwarded to the Station House Officer after the prosecution had been initiated, and (ii) copy of judgment dated March 12, 1958, passed by the ad







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top