SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(MP) 239

G.P.BHUTT, T.C.SHRIVASTAVA
BISARTI, LACHCHI LODHI – Appellant
Versus
SUKARTI, DURJAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.R.NAOLEKAR, R.S.DABIR

SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent appeal is directed against the judgment in Second Appeal No. 983 of 1956, delivered on 21-8-1957.

( 2 ) THE appellant Mst. Bisarti was the defendant in Civil Suit No. 17-A of 1954 of the Court of the 2nd Civil Judge (Class II), Schora. That suit was instituted by the respondents (plaintiffs) for possession of a house and certain tenancy lands in village Pakaria. Tahsil Sehora, District Jabalpur. Lachchi, who was the tenant of the lands and owner of the house, died in 1949, leaving the appellant Mst. Bisarti as his widow and Mst. Ranchi as his mother. Mst. Ranchi died on 7-41953 and Mst. Bisarti (appellant) remarried one Pandu in churi form according to the caste custom. The respondents are the sisters of Lachchi deceased. Their suit was based on the ground that after her remarriage, Mst. Bisarti (appellant) lost her rights in her husband's property and they being the nearest rcversioners were entitled to the property. They alleged that they took possession of the same ia October 1953, but they were dispossessed by the appellant. They, therefore, sued for possession of the lands and the house. It may be stated here that no date about the rem











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top