SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(MP) 245

V.R.NEWASKAR
GHASIRAM MOTIRAM KULMI – Appellant
Versus
NANNIBAI NATHULAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.L.Maharshi, W.Y.Pande

V. R. NEWASKAR, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants, who are the residents of Mouja Kodaria engaged the services of a mason named Nathulal for plastering a wall of a well. The welt had already been dug and was deeper than 20 feet below the ground level. While Nathulal was engaged in plastering a newly constructed wall of the well a portion of it fell down and he sustained injuries in that accident and died as a result. An application was thereupon submitted by the wife and the mother of the deceased for compensation under the provisions of Workmen's Compensation Act before the Commissioner appointed under the Act. The claim was opposed by the appellants on the ground that the said mason Nathulal was not a workman within the meaning of the term as used in the Act and as such the respondents were entitled to no compensation. There were other contentions raised besides this but the same are no longer material in view of the only point pressed in this appeal as to the deceased Nathulal being a workman under the Act, which the Commissioner found against the appellants.

( 2 ) MR. Pandey who appeared for the appellants contended that Nathulal could not be said to be a workman as contemplated under th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top