SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(MP) 137

T.C.SHRIVASTAVA, G.P.BHUTT
MULAMCHAND RATILAL ASATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.L.KHASKALAM, K.K.DUBEY, M.N.PHADKE

BHUTT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent appeal against the order of Naik J. in Miscellaneous Petition No. 197 of 1956. The order in this appeal shall also dispose of Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 92, 142 and 168, all of 1956. In all these cases the right of the State Government to realize the dues under forest contracts as arrears of land revenue is in question.

( 2 ) AS a result of the coming into force of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act 1950 (No. 1 of 1951), the village forests vested in the State with effect from 31 March 1951. The right to propagate and collect lac in some of the forests of Balaghat district was auctioned by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Balaghat, for the years 1951-52, 1952-53 and 1953-54 during September and October 1951, and the bids of the present appellant Mulamchand for Rs. 69,500/-, and of the petitioners of Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 142 and 168 of 1956, namely, Keshrimal of the former and Shivlal of the latter petition, for Rs. 34,500/- and Rs. 11,250/- respectively, being the highest, were accepted. In these cases, separate indentures were executed by the present appellant and the ot
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top