SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(MP) 56

SHIV DAYAL
RAM KUMAR DANI AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
JEEVANLAL, DHUMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.D.Deoras, I.S.Mishra

SHIV DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against an order, rejecting the application of the plaintiff under Order 1, Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure for permission to sue the defendants for the benefit of all persons who may be interested in the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff nominated Jcevanlal, Jhadu and Krishna to represent the numerous persons residing in the vicinity of his tank known as "naya-talao" and its embankments, situate at Raipur, bearing Khasra Nos. 400 and 401 respectively. The allegations in the plaint arc that in or about the month of October 1955, the above-named three defendants wrongfully planted certain trees on the plaintiff's land without any right and without his knowledge or consent. When the plaintiff came to know of this on or about October 5, 1955, he tried to remove them whereupon the defendants came to the spot and asserted that the trees had been planted by them and they would not allow him to remove them at any cost and further they also asserted that they had planted the trees and were preventing him from removing them in the interests of and tor the benefit of the public residing in the vicinity. The plaintiff prayed in the suit for a perma










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top