SHIV DAYAL
SAYYED IBNE HASAN MAZHAR HUSAIN – Appellant
Versus
MST. MEHTAB LATAFAT HUSAIN – Respondent
( 2 ) THE defence was that the plaintiff was the owner only of the southern portion, which had been given by way of gift, but not ot the northern portion. Both the Courts dismissed the plaintiff's suit on the ground that at no time had possession been delivered of the northern portion to the plaintiff, nor was there any registered sale deed in his favour.
( 3 ) IT Is an undisputed fact that after the gift of 1931 of the southern portion, when Ibne Husain started construction of the house one Banarasi Das came in his way and on the basis of a mortgage deed Ex. P. 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.