SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(MP) 43

V.R.NEWASKAR, H.R.KRISHNAN
RUBAB BAI, SHARAF ALI – Appellant
Versus
ASST. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY CUM-MANAGING OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Balwant Singh, M.A.Khan

NEWASKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and is directed against the Custodian 'and Assistant Custodian, Evacuee Property, Indore.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are four in number, Petitioners Nos. 1, 3 and 4 claim to be the joint owners of House No. 1/163 situated in Kasaiwada and No. 689, Chowk Bazar of Shajapur while petitioner No. 2 claims to have an interest of a mortgagee thereon. The circumstances in which the petitioners seek to quash the orders of the opponents with reference to the above mentioned house tire as under: the house initially belonged to one Sharafali who died leaving behind his widow, daughters and sons. Three of his sons namely Alimohammad, Abbas and Fida hussain were, on Credible information, believed to have migrated to Pakistan. Notices were issued by the Assistant Custodian Evacuee Property under Section 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act on 1-4-1955. The petitioners objected to the declaration of the said property as evacuee property. However the assistant Custodian by his order dated 19-2-1956 declared the aforesaid three sons of Sharafali as evacuees under Section 2 (d) (ii) of the Act and their property as evac














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top