SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(MP) 25

S.P.BHARGAVA, N.M.GOLVALKER
OM PRAKASH MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL FIRE AND GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.SANGHI, T.C.Naik

BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of a claim made by the appellant before the Motor vehicles Claims Tribunal, Jabalpur, on the allegation that there was a collision between his car (No. MPJ 9339) and the motor bus (No. MPJ 790) belonging to the respondent, No. 2, on 13-9-1959. It was alleged that the petitioner sustained bodily injury in the accident for which damages amounting to Rs. 10,200/- were claimed. It was also alleged that in the same accident, the petitioner's car was damaged and on account of the damage to his car, Rs. 6,000/- as damages were claimed.

( 2 ) THE Claims Tribunal held after hearing arguments that it had no jurisdiction to try the claim in respect of damage to the car and decided issue No. 10 (a) against the appellant. It is against this order that the present appeal has been filed.

( 3 ) BEFORE we heard arguments on merits, a preliminary point was raised on behalf of the respondents challenging the tenability of this appeal. The objection is based on the provision contained in Section 110-D of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter called the 'act') which reads as under:--

"section 110-D (1):--Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), any pe




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top