SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(MP) 13

P.V.DIXIT, S.P.BHARGAVA
SHYAMSINGH JASWANTSINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRALHADSINGH TIKARAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.H.SAFI, A.P.SEN, R.K.Pandey

DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent appeal by the plaintiff from a decision of Shrivastava, J. arises out of a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of certain lands and for damages in the alternative. The suit was dismissed by the Civil Judge, Second class, Hoshangabad, who tried, it. In appeal the learned Additional District Judge of Hoshangabad gave to the plaintiff a decree for specific performance of the contract. The defendant-respondents thereupon preferred a second appeal in this court which was allowed by the learned Single Judge and the plaintiffs claim for specific performance of the contract was dismissed. The learned Single Judge, however, gave to the plaintiff a decree for Rs. 600/-as damages against the respondent Pralhad Singh.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the plaintiffs case was that on 8th/9th April 1951 the respondent pralhad-singh entered into an oral agreement with him for sale of the suit lands for rs. 2700/-; that on 28th April 1951 he gave to Pralhadsingh wheat of the value of rs. 1600/- in part payment of the price; that before the execution of the sale deed pralhadsingh later on sold the property to the respondent No. 4 Shersingh on 4th june 195















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top