SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(MP) 8

S.B.SEN
NANBOO KEDAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.L.Dubey

S. B. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE two appellants Nanboo and Kutar have been convicted under Section 304 (Part II) and 304 (Part II) read with Section 114. I. P. C. and have been sentenced to Rule 1 for 6 years and 4 years respectively.

( 2 ) ON 14-3-1960 at about 9 a. m. there was a Puja known as "badawat" in the house of one Lalsingh P. W. 1, where many persons assembled including the two appellants, as well as Gulabingh P. W. 2, Jayram P. W. 3, Dalsingh P. W. 4, Kadu p. W. 5 and Bhilu P. W. 12. They all belonged to the same village. The deceased ratan-singh also came there and sat in the assembly. His presence was however objected to by appellant No. 2 Kutar on the ground that lie had an illicit connection with the wife of his son Juwan-singh. Ratansingh's denial of the fact resulted in some quarrel at which Kutar asked his son Nanboo, appellant No. 1 to beat him. Nanboo accordingly took up a log of wood lying nearby and gave on the head of ratan a heavy blow. Ratan fell down and. the two appellants ran away. On receipt of this information the police arrived at the village at about 12 in the noon and inquired about the incident. On the next day Ratan was sent to the hospital of jobat. On 1











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top