SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(MP) 90

P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Appellant
Versus
AINKUMAR KALURAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.Choubey, P.R.Padhye

DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent appeal from a decision of Tare J. By that decision the learned Single Judge reversing the judgments of the Courts below remitted the plaintiff-respondent's suit praying for a decree for Rs. 484/11/3 against the appellant for further trial.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the plaintiff's case was that eight bales of cloth were consigned to him by Messrs Bachharaj Amolakchand of Nagpur from Nagpur to Itarsi on 3rd january 1947; that on 18th January 1947 seven of these bates were delivered but one was not delivered as it was said to have been stolen; that subsequently a case of theft in respect of the bale was registered against one Dwarkaprasad who was tried and convicted for the offence of theft; that the baie was also recovered from dwarkaprasad and during the course of the criminal trial was handed over by the court to the A. D. C. I. , Bhopal; and that it was in the month of November 1952 that the plaintiff came to know for the first time thai the bale had been delivered to the A. D. C. I. , Bhopal. Tile further averment of the plaintiff was that after the receipt of the bale by the a. D. C. I. , Bhopal, the railway administration became a trustee








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top