SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(MP) 143

P.K.TARE
SARASWATIBAI, HIMMATSINGH – Appellant
Versus
IDRAKUDDIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.Choubey, Y.S.DHARMADHIKARI

P. K. TARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the defendant against the decree, dated, 24-11-1959, passed by Shri V. D. Joshi, Additional District Judge, Betul, in Civil Appeal No. 6-A of 1957, affirming the decree, dated, 18-7-1957, passed by Shri G. K. Parashar, Second additional Civil Judge, Betul, in Civil Suit No. 4-A of 1957. Equivalent Citation:

( 2 ) THE respondent executed a registered sale deed, dated, 10-9-1947 in favour of the appellant regarding certain malik makbuza land, having an area of 19. 40 acres, for a consideration of Rs. 1900/ -. The sale deed was probably executed at the time of partition of the country, when the respondent was probably scared on account of his anxiety for his safety. That was undoubtedly an out and out sale deed, although the respondent's contention was that it was a mortgage. However, he did not make any attempt to establish his allegation about the transaction being a mortgage.

( 3 ) THE appellant leased back the fields to the respondent on 15-9-1947. The lease was for the agricultural year 1947-48; and as such was to expire on 2-5-1948.

( 4 ) ACCORDING to the appellant, the respondent took a loan from one, Rameshwar and put his signature in the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top