SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 31

T.SHRIVASTAVA, P.K.TARE
FIRM GOPAL COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
FIRM HAZARILAL COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.H.SAFI, A.P.SEN, R.P.SINHA, R.S.DABIR

SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the defendants against the judgment in Civil Suit No. 14 of 1952 of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Bhopal, decided on 31-12-1958, decreeing the claim of the respondent for Rs. 29,300. 00 and costs.

( 2 ) THE suit was brought by the firm 'messrs. Hazariial', a dissolved partnership firm, through. Hazariial, one of its five partners. The appellant No. 1 gopal and company, acts as selling agent of the Bhopal Textiles Limited, Bhopal. Appellant no. 2 Shiv Narain was one of the Directors OT Gopal and Co. On 9-5-1948 the plaintiff had contracted to purchase from the Bhopal Textiles 2101 bales of cloth of which 1050 hales were to be lifted in May 1948 and the rest in June 1948. The contract is incorporated in the document Ex. D-1, which gives the details of cloth sold. The plaintiff first took delivery of 623 bales during the period ending May 1948.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff alleged that the price of cloth fell down and he would have been put to a heavy loss if he had lifted the rest of the bales. Further, he alleged that the contract was entered into as a consequence of some misrepresentation made by the defendants. However, the details of t
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top