SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 100

A.H.KHAN
SARDAR VIJAYSINGH RAO GHORPADE – Appellant
Versus
JEEWAN LAL RAM DAS JAISWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.AGRAWAL, H.A.Shah

( 1 ) THE facts out of which this second appeal arises in short are that Ramchandra rao Shitole, as the next friend of Vijaysinghrao (minor) filed a suit in the Court of the Civil Judge, Gwalior alleging that the sale made by the father of the minor, of a part of a house in favour of Jeewanlal was without necessity, that the sale should be set aside and that the possession of the property in dispute be handed over to the guardian, Among other pleas raised by the defendant, one was that because the property in dispute had been sold by the natural guardian, only the minor on attaining majority could bring a suit for setting aside the sale, and that during the subsistence of the minority, the suit by the present guardian of the minor (who is, by the way, admittedly a guardian appointed by the court under guardians and Wards Act) does not lie and the suit is therefore premature. The trial Court upheld this contention and, dismissed the suit as being premature. This decision was affirmed in appeal by the learned District Judge, Gwalior. This is now plaintiff's second appeal.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to English Common Law, the rights of minors were specially protected, and time did not run agains






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top