SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 79

SHIV DAYAL, P.R.SHARMA
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
RAJA BALBHADRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BAJPAI, Patanker

SHIV DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from a decree passed against the State Government for the recovery of Rs. 22,141/11/5 in favour of the respondent. The plaintiff was the jagirdar of Rajhogarh. The Jagir vested in the State of Madhya Bharat on december 4, 1952, by virtue of the M. B. Abolition of Jagir Act, 1952. The plaintiff was entitled to recover Rs. 19843/12/- on account of excise duty on liquor and Rs. 5,678/13/- on account of Ganja, Bhang and opium; total Rs. 24,622/- which had been realised by the State Government on behalf of the Jagirdar for the period between 1-4-49 and 31-3-51. There is no dispute that this amount was clue to the plaintiff from the State Government. The defendant resisted the claim on the sole ground that he was not liable to pay that sum because the Government had already adjusted the sum of Rs. 20,415/11/5 which was payable by the plaintiff to it. The balance of Rs. 4206/13/7 thus remaining due to the plaintiff had already been deposited in the treasury and subsequently in the trial Court. And that sum was paid to the plaintiff through the Court.

( 2 ) WE are called upon to determine two questions in this appeal. Firstly, whether the defendant St











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top