SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 64

S.P.BHARGAVA, T.C.SHRIVASTAVA
KUMARI SUSHMA MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL PROVINCES TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.SANGHI, K.L.Gupta, R.S.DABIR, T.C.Naik

SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS order governs the disposal of three other miscellaneous appeals Nos. 59, 60 and 86 all of 1961, also. All these appeals are filed by the applicants in petitions which were tiled before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jabalpur, for recovery of compensation, in respect of personal injuries caused to them in motor accidents. A preliminary objection regarding the maintainability or the applications was raised and the Court upheld the objection and returned the plaint in each case for presentation to the Civil Court. It is against these orders that the tour appeals are directed.

( 2 ) THE dates on which the accidents occurred and the claims were filed are given below: case No. Date of Date of filing accident claim m. A. No. 59/611 13-9-1959 12-11-1959 and m. A. No. 60/61 m. A. 58/61 12-6-1959 29-9-1959 m. A. 86/61 24-1-1959 28-9-1959

( 3 ) SECTIONS 110, 110-A to 110-F were introduced in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, by the Motor vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1956 (100 of 1956) providing for the constitution of one or more Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for the purpose of adjudicating upon claims for compensation in respect of accidents involving death or bad





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top