SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 59

N.M.GOLVALKER, S.P.BHARGAVA
FIRM BACHHRAJ AMOLAKCHAND – Appellant
Versus
FIRM NANDLAL SITARAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.H.SAFI, A.P.SEN, C.P.Singh

BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of Civil Suit No. 27-B of 1958 instituted in the Court of iiird Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, by the appellant firm against the respondent firm for the recovery of Rs. 11168-12-0 as damages for breach of contract. There is also another appeal (First Appeal No. 209 of 1959) which arises out of Civil Suit No. 26-B of 1958 instituted by the same plaintiff-appellant firm against a different defendant partnership firm Nandlal Radhakishan for the recovery of Rs. 10182-11-0 as damages for similar breach of contract. Both the suits were dismissed by the trial Court.

( 2 ) THE questions for consideration in both the appeals are identical, though the suits were based on different contracts. The evidence for both the cases was recorded in Civil Suit No. 26-B of 1958. This judgment shall therefore govern the disposal of both the appeals.

( 3 ) IN the body of this judgment we are referring to the facts of Civil Suit No. 27-B of 1958. Reference to documents will have to be construed to the corresponding documents in the other case (Civil Suit No. 26-B of 1958 ). Express reference to them for the disposal of the other appeal is not necessary.

( 4 )
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top