SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 52

SHIV DAYAL, P.R.SHARMA
HARI NARAIN BUDDHARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.MISHRA, Nagarkar

SHIV DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by special leave under Section 417 (3) of the Code of Criminal procedure from an order of acquittal on private complaint by appellant Harnarain. His case was that Shyamlal, Jagram and Deopaldas respondents got a hand bill printed by Laxmanrao respondent No. 4 and this handbill contained statements defamatory of the complainant. Shri Misra has not pressed this appeal as regards laxmanrao respondent No. 4. The impugned handbill is an appeal issued by the accused dissuading the public from giving any subscription to the complainant and one Manohar who is not a party to this case. It was said among other things that harnarain and Manobar raised huge subscriptions which they invested in their own personal business; that formerly they used to repair shoes and were carrying on the business of a shoeblack, but extended the business and were running two boot houses. We would reproduce only the significant portion of the handbill on which shri Misra laid stress. The caption of the handbill is "thagion Se Bacho. "

"pichhale samaye ek parcha Shri Harnarayan Ken Wa Manohar ne chanda ughane ke liye nikalwaya hai. Lashkar Gwalior wa Murar ke jatwon se anek ba









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top