SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 108

P.K.TARE
THE KALYANMAL MILLS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VOLIMOHAMMED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.C.Dhandia, HARBANS SINGH

P. K. TARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code is by the defendant against the order, dated, 29-8-1961, passed by Shri S. N. Chaturvedi, Additional district Judge, Indore, in Civil Suit No. 61 of 1955, holding that the present respondent, Miss Hamida was a legal representative of the original plaintiff, Wali mohammad for the purposes of continuing the suit under Order 22, Rule 5 of the civil Procedure Code. Wali Mohammad filed the present suit on 30-9- 1955, wherein he claimed an amount of Rs. 29,651/-from the Mills, as also fixation of the bonus amount to him.

( 2 ) AT this stage, we are not concerned with the merits of the defence raised by the petitioner. Wali Mohammad died on 18-9-1959 and an application for substitution was made by the present respondent Miss Hamida on 17-10-1959. That was well within time.

( 3 ) THE defendant Mills contested the application on the ground that the claimant was not the real daughter of the deceased. Wall Mohammad. The question, therefore, arises whether her name could be substituted as a legal representative of the deceased plaintiff.

( 4 ) A legal representative is defined by Section 2 (11) of the Civil Proced


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top