SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 184

P.K.TARE, H.R.KRISHNAN
CHUNNILAL ONKARMAL LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MOHANLAL BALKRISHNA AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.G.BHALERAO, G.M.Chafekar

KRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment and decree of the learned civil Judge I, Indore dismissing no suit for the refund of an advance payment made to the defendant in course of a transaction following an oral agreement to buy a quantity of stone chips for building purposes, A small quantity has been delivered and accepted, the price of which the plaintiff had deducted from his claim, me rest of the agreed quantity was rejected by the plaintiff for reasons which the defendant considered unsatisfactory; Accordingly, the plaintiff demanded the refund, which being refused, he brought the suit, the Court found that the plaintiff was guilty of the breach; and at the same time that the amount given to the defendant was not earnest money properly so called guaranteeing performance of the contract, out only part of the price paid in advance, sun a decided that he was not entitled to a refund, and accordingly dismissed the suit.

( 2 ) THE questions that arose, are, ore the facts firstly, which of the parties was guilty of the breach; secondly, whether the total amount paid was Rs. 5400/- as averred by the plaintiff or only Rs. 5000/- as admitted by we defend

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top