V. R. NEWASKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order of remand passed by the IVth additional District Judge, Ujjain under Order 41, Rule 23, C. P. C. , and the only question raised in this appeal is that the appeal in the Court below should not have been entertained as the same was barred by limitation.

( 2 ) FACTS material for consideration of the question thus raised are as follows :

( 3 ) APPELLANT Kanhaiyalal filed Civil Suit No. 44 of 1937 and obtained a decree declaring his right to certain properties and also granting injunction against madanlal and his son Ramchandra which was ultimately confirmed by the Indore high Court in Civil Second Appeal No. 116 of 1939. This decree was put into execution. In the course of the execution of that decree the judgment-debtors madanlal and his son Ramchandra raised the contention that the decree did not include the land which is the subject-matter of the present suit. This contention was ultimately rejected in Civil Second Appeal No. 291 of 1950. Thereupon another son of Madanlal namely Ramkrishan filed the present suit claiming a declaration that the decisions in Civil Second Appeal No, 116/1939 and Second appeal No. 291/195

Click Here to Read the rest of this document