SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(MP) 51

V.R.NEWASKAR, H.R.KRISHNAN, S.B.SEN
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
JOGILAL KESHRIMAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.L.Dubey, S.N.GUPTA

KRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) THE respondents who run a business in foodgrains at a place called Khetia on the border of the Maharashtra State have been acquitted by the First Class magistrate, Sendhwa, of the offence of contravening one of the provisions of the madhya Pradesh Foodgrain Dealers Licensing Order, punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act of 1955. The contravention was their storing, in course of their business, 155 maunds of rice ore 16-2-1959 without a valid license. While finding the facts, as alleged by the prosecution, the learned Magistrate; held that the respondents were only guilty of "haste and ignorance" and there was no mens rea; elsewhere he has suggested that the offence was only of "technical, nature". Accordingly he has acquitted them. In the State appeal it is pointed out that on the. facts themselves these appellants were liable to punishment especially because such contraventions' lead to extensive export to other States and sales at unconscionably high prices.

( 2 ) THE Questions in this Court are, whether they were justified because they had already obtained a license under the Madhya Bharat Agricultural Produce Markets act on 1952, which wa











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top