SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(MP) 38

P.K.TARE, H.R.KRISHNAN
DEVISAHAI PREMRAJ MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
GOVINDRAO BALWANTRAO – Respondent


P. K. TARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the defendant against the decree, dated 10-1-1959, passed by shri S. L. Sharma, Second Additional District Judge, indore, in Civil Suit No. 14 of 1961, decreeing the first respondent's suit for redemption of it mortgage, dated 26-11-1929 which he had executed in favour of the appellant, Devisahai.

( 2 ) THE first respondent, Sardar Govindrao is owner of the suit house. He executed a possessory mortgage in favour of the appellant on 26-11-1929 for a consideration of Rs. 10,000/ -. Subsequent to the mortgage, certain other developments have taken place on the strength of which the appellant contests the mortgagor's right to redeem. According to the appellant, the mortgagor had agreed to sell the mortgaged properly to him for a consideration of Rs. 50,000/-; and in pursuance of the same, a sale deed was actually executed and duly signed on 10-10-1950. But before presentation of the sale deed for registration, the mortgagor changed his mind and by using the other stamp papers of the deed except the first and the last, the mortgagor altered it into a deed of sale, dated 14-10-1950 in favour of the second respondent. Gyarsilal, for a consideration o






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top