P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
BADRI PRASAD SADASHIVRAO – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE, G. R. KALE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS order will also govern the disposal of Misc. Petitions Nos. 392 and from 404 to 416, all of 1963,
( 2 ) THE petitioners in all these applications under Article 226 of the Constitution were until lately appearing for parties in cases in the subordinate courts at Indore after obtaining general powers of attorney from parties, and in some cases special equivalent Citation: powers of attorney. In July 1963 a complaint was received by the District Judge of indore from the Bar Association, Indore, stating that the petitioner Badri Prasad, in M. P. No. 329 of 1963, and other persons, under the cover of general powers of attorney and also in some cases special powers of attorney, were appearing for parties in cases and practising as legal practitioners for them, and that they also attired themselves as lawyers. Thereupon the learned District Judge held an inquiry into the matter. He directed all the petitioners to furnish him a list of cases in which they were appearing in the various subordinate courts as recognised agents. On the basis of the information supplied by the petitioners, the learned District judge found that the petitioner in each case had obtained a nu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.