SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(MP) 95

P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
PREMCHAND JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.A.Chitale, M.ADHIKARI, M.N.PHADKE, P.C.PATHAK, R.J.BHAVE, R.K.Tankha, V.S.DABIR

PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is mainly directed against-

(i) an order dated 2nd February 1965 whereby R. S. Shukla, Special secretary to the State Government in the Home Department, approved under Section 68d (2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter called the Act), Schemes Nos. 2, 4, 5, 7 and 9 with certain modifications, all these Schemes having been prepared and published earlier under section 68c of the Act; (ii) the subsequent publication of Scheme No. 2 in the Official Gazette dated 12th February 1965 as required by Section 68d (3) of the Act; and (iii) a notice dated 26th February 1965 Issued under Section 68f (2) of the Act by which certain permits held by the petitioner for some routes covered by Scheme No. 2 were cancelled.

( 2 ) IN Miscellaneous Petition No. 126 of 1965, some other existing operators have claimed similar reliefs in regard to the same Scheme No. 2. For like reliefs, similar miscellaneous Petitions, Nos. 129 and 159 of 1965 in regard to Scheme No. 4, No. 171 of 1965 in regard to Scheme No. 5, Nos. 157, 165, 169, 170 and 243 of 1965 in regard to Scheme No. 7 and Nos. 137, 149, 158 and 168 of 1965 in re



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top