SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(MP) 69

V.R.NEWASKAR, S.B.SEN
MANORAMA BAI – Appellant
Versus
MANISHANKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.SHARMA, M.D.Kirtane

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against a judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, ujjain on a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955.

( 2 ) THE petition was filed by one Manishankar against his wife Manoramabai. They were married on 22-5-57. After marriage for two years Manoramabai continued to live with Manishankar as his wife and they lived happily at Ujjain. On 10-1-59, father of Manoramabai look her away for some treatment to Shajapur. When manoramabai went she had with her ornaments belonging to the petitioner.

( 3 ) IN 1960 and before that the petitioner had written several letters to his wife and also to his father-in-law but either there was no reply or false replies were given. In 1960 he personally went to the house of his father-in-law and requested personally to send his wife back, but he did not succeed in bringing her back. Subsequently also he made several attempts to bring his wife but he was not successful.

( 4 ) MANORAMABAI, the petitioner further alleged was acting in the school as a teacher. The petitioner tried to meet her at Akodia where she had been serving, but her father prevented her from doing so. Ultimately on 4-12-62, Manishankar s















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top