SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(MP) 55

K.L.PANDEY, P.V.DIXIT
RAMNETRA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.J.BHAVE, R.K.Tankha

PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution to call up and quash by certiorari-

(i) an order dated 16th July 1963 whereby the Superintendent of Police, chhindwara, dismissed the petitioner from service; (ii) an order dated 24th October 1963 by which the Deputy Inspector general of Police, Jabalpur, dismissed the petitioner's appeal against the earlier order; and (iii) an order dated 24 February 1964 by which the Inspector General of police rejected the petitioner's further representation against the action taken in regard to him.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this petition are these. At the material time, the petitioner was employed as a Head Constable attached to the Police Station House at Amarwara, on 25th December 1962, Abdul Mobin, Circle Inspector, received from one Maganlal a complaint against the petitioner. The Circle Inspector held a preliminary enquiry and submitted his report to the Superintendent of Police who, on 24th January 1963, directed that a departmental enquiry be held against the petitioner on the following charges:

(i) For not taking cognizance of an offence when, in his presence, Mihilal was obstructing Jhanaklal Patwari







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top