SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(MP) 154

P.V.DIXIT, R.J.BHAVE
BHOPAL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SEN, K.A.Chitale, K.K.DUBEY

BHAVE, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a Public Ltd. , Company and carries on the business of manufacture of sugar. The petitioner-company owns extensive sugarcane farms. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sehore, who is the competent authority under the madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 (Act No 20 of 1960) (hereinafter referred to as the Act), served a notice on the petitioner-company calling upon it to submit a return in terms of Section 9 of the Act. In reply to the said notice, the Company submitted that it held only "exempted land" and that under the scheme of the Act the company was not required to submit a return This contention was accepted by the competent authority and the proceedings were dropped. The Commissioner, Bhopal Division, however, in exercise of his revisional jurisdiction, called upon the company to show cause why the order of the competent authority should not be revised and that authority be directed to proceed with the enquiry contemplated under Section 10 of the Act. After hearing the company, the Commissioner came to the conclusion that every holder of land was bound to submit a return irrespective of the kind of land he held. The commissioner











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top