( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 44 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales tax Act, 1958. (hereinafter called the Act), at the Instance of the assessee, M/s. S. R. Calcuttawala, Indore. The questions, which the Sales Tax Tribunal has placed before us for decision, are-" (1) Is P. V. C. rexine cloth leather-cloth? (2) Is P. V. C. rexine cloth exempted from the payment of sales tax under Item (6) of Schedule I of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958? (3) Is the sale of P. V. C. Rexine cloth taxable under Item (88) of schedule II of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act. 1958? (4) Is the sale of P. V. C. rexine cloth taxable under Item (1) of Part VI of Schedule II of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958? and (5) Is the sale of P. V. C rexine cloth exempted from the payment of sales tax under Notification No. 2765-2264-VST dated 12-12-1960 of the separate Revenue Department of the Government of Madhya Pradesh?"

( 2 ) THE assessee. M/s. S. R. Calcuttawala is a dealer engaged in the business of sale of P. V. C. Rexine cloth. In the assessment proceedings for the period from 1st April 1960 to 31st March 1961 the assessee claimed that the sale transactions of Rexine cloth were exempt from any sales tax under the Act. The Sales Tax officer rejected this claim for exemption, and levied Sales Tax at the rate of even per cent under Item-38 of Schedule II to the Act on the sales of Rexine cloth by the assessee. The assessee unsuccessfully appealed first before the Appellate assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, and then before the Board of Revenue functioning as the Sales Tax Tribunal. ( 3 ) ITEM-38 of Schedule II, which was relied on by the taxing authorities for making an assessment of sales tax, at the rate of seven per cent. on the sales of Rexine cloth is as follows-" leather cloth, rubber cloth, oil-cloth, waterproof cloth and linoleum, tarpaulin and goods made thereof excepting sport goods". The Sales Tax Officer. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal, all look the view that Rexine was "leather cloth" and as such subject to sales tax at the rate of seven per cent by virtue of Item-38 of Schedule-II. The assessee based its claim for exemption on Item-6 of Schedule I to the Act which enumerates the articles which have been exempted from sales lax under section 10 of the Act. Item-6 is in the following words--"all varieties of cloth manufactured in mills or on powerlooms or handlooms including processed cloth but excluding pure silk cloth" it also relied, in the alternative, on a notification issued by the Government on 12th December 1960 in exercise of its powers under Section 12 of the Act. This section provides that-"the State Government may subject to such restrictions and conditions as may be specified, by notification, exempt in whole or in part any class of dealers or any goods or class of goods from the payment of tax under this Act for such period as may be specified in the notification" the notification issued on 12th December 1960 under Section 12 of the Act ran thus-

"in exercise of the powers, conferred by Section 12 of the Madhya pradesb General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (No. 2 of 1959), and in partial modification of this Department Notification No. 738-3694 V-SR. , dated 1-4-1959, the State Government hereby exempts with effect from the 1st April, 1959 to 31st March, 1961, in whole, all varieties of canvas cloth, water-proof cloth, tarpaulins and similar products, manufactured with cloth as base in textile mills, power-loom factories or processing factories from the payment of sales lax when sold by a dealer, registered under the said Act. "

The Tribunal rejected the assessee's claim for exemption holding that Rexine was not "cloth" only; that it was an article with cloth as a base and a coating or coatings thereupon of Polyvinyl Chloride: and that this "finished product" known as "p. V. C. Rexine cloth" was not any variety of cloth manufactured or "processed ' in mills or on powerlooms or handlo