SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(MP) 127

R.J.BHAVE, P.V.DIXIT
DEVKUMARSINGHJI KASTURCHANDJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS order will also govern the disposal of Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 73 and from 90 to 99. all of 1965. and Nos. 7 to 9. all of 1966.

( 2 ) THE petitioners in these fifteen applications under Article 226 of the Constitution are owners of buildings and lands situated within the limits of the Indore Municipal corporation. They challenge the validity of the Madhya Pradesh Nagariya Slhawar sampatti Kar Adhiniyam. 1964. (No. 14 of 1964; hereinafter referred to us as the act), and pray that the said Act be declared to be ultra vires the power of the state Legislature and be struck down as unconstitutional. They also pray that the state of Madhva Pradesh be restrained from enforcing any of the provisions of the act and from recovering any amount of property-tax from the petitioners under the Act, and further that the demand notices issued to the petitioners for the payment of property-tax be quashed and any amount recovered from them as property-tax be refunded to them.

( 3 ) BEFORE stating the contentions of the petitioners attacking the validity of the Act and examining their tenability, it is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Act and of the Mad





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top