SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(MP) 55

H.R.KRISHNAN, M.A.RAZZAQUE
CHANDMAL RATICHAND JHABUA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Balwant Singh, S.L.GARG

( 1 ) THIS is a petition by one of the money-lenders carrying on that trade in a scheduled area challenging the vires of most of the provisions in a body of regulations made by the Governor of Madhya Pradesh in exercise or the powers in paragraph 5 (2) of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution and entitled the "madhya pradesh Scheduled Tribes Debt Relief Regulations 1962". They came into force on 15-8-1983 and have been subsequently amended by the amending regulations of 1963 (actually numbered 1 of 1964 ). There is also a body of rules made under the regulation No 26 of 1962. Both the original and this amending regulations have received the assent of the President; but the petitioner challenges the vires on the general grounds and besides has questioned their vires on grounds relatable to some of the more important regulations.

( 2 ) GENERALLY the argument is twofold; first, that these regulations having been made under Para 5 (2) (c) of Fifth Schedule to the Constitution by way of regulating the business of money-lending and not under Para 5 (2) generally for the peace and good Govt. of the area, these provisions could not have been made because they are so drastic as to shut out





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top