H.R.KRISHNAN, M.A.RAZZAQUE
CHANDMAL RATICHAND JHABUA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P – Respondent
( 2 ) GENERALLY the argument is twofold; first, that these regulations having been made under Para 5 (2) (c) of Fifth Schedule to the Constitution by way of regulating the business of money-lending and not under Para 5 (2) generally for the peace and good Govt. of the area, these provisions could not have been made because they are so drastic as to shut out
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.