High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
P. V. Dixit, C. J. and G. P. Singh, J.
BANKU BIHARI SAHA - Appellant
Versus
STATE GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH - Respondents
Misc. Petn. 214 Of 1968
Decided On : 12/03/1968
(2) Words and Phrases-royalty-meaning of.
Section 15 (I) empowers the State Government to make rules for regulating the grant of mining leases in respect of minor minerals and for purposes connected therewith.
Royalty is a payment to the lessor proportionate to the amount of the mineral worked, it is paid in addition to dead rent and surface rent and is a normal feature of mining leases.
Royalty being a necessary concomitant of mining leases, power to make rules for regulating the grant of mining leases, minor minerals, and for purposes connected therewith will necessarily include the power to make rules fixing the rates of royalty in respect of minor minerals. [Para 3
(3) Minor Mineral Rules, 1961 (M.P.) - R.25 (I)-payment of royalty as per schedule-not limited by terms of the lease-change of schedule under R. 24 (2)-liability of lessee to pay royalty at revised rates-limitation on the power of the Government.
Every quarry lease is subject to the conditions contained in sub-rule (I) of Rule 25 which includes in c1ame (I) (a) the conditions of payment of royalty at the rates specified in the first schedule.
The liability of the lessee to pay royalty at the rate specified in the first schedule follows from the rules itself and does not depend upon any term contained in the lease-deed.
After the schedule is amended by exercise of the power under rule 24 (2), the revised rates become the rates specified in the first schedule and the lessee becomes liable to pay the royalty at the revised rates.
There is one limitation on the power of the Government to amend the schedule which is contained in proviso to rule 24 (2). The rate cannot be revised more than once during the period of five years. [Para 4
(4) Minor Mineral Rules, 1961 (M.P.) - Rr.24 (2) & 25 (I)-use of 'form'-form not to limit the meaning of an enactment.
(5) Interpretation of Statutes-'form' appended 10 the rules-cannot affect unambiguous meaning of the rules.
The proviso contained in the 'form V' cannot limit the plain language contained in rule 25 (1) or rule 24 (2) because any provision in a form cannot be permitted to limit the meaning of an unambiguous enactment, though a form may be referred for the purpose of throwing light on the construction of doubtful or ambiguous enactment.
Thus the mining lease form must be read subject to rules 24 & 25 & so read it may be construed as an additional power conferred by contract to revise the rate of royalty.
Thus it does not affect the liability of the lessee arising under rule 25 (I) to pay royalty at the rate that may be specified in the schedule. [Para 4
( 1 ) THE petitioner was holder of a quarry lease for lime stone for a period of five years commencing from 3rd November, 1961. Under Clause (3) of the lease, he was liable to pay royalty at the rate of 10 per cent of the sale value at the pit's mouth subject to a minimum of 0. 50 paise per ton for lime stone, 0. 75 paise per ton for slacked lime and Re. 1 per ton for unslacked lime. This was also the rate of royalty then prescribed for lime stone in Schedule I to the Madhya Pradesh Minor minerals Rules, 1961. There was a proviso to Clause (3) of the lease, which enabled the lessor to revise the rate of royalty every five years commencing from the date of the lease. By a notification dated 9th December, 1965 Schedule I to the Minor Minerals Rules was amended by the State Government and the rate of royalty for lime stone was fixed at Rs. 2 per tonne from 1st January, 1966. For the period after 1st January, 1966, the petitioner was assessed to royalty by the mining Officer at the rate of Rs. 2 per tonne. The petitioner protested and claimed that in his case the rate of royalty could not be revised before expiry of five years, and that he was governed by the rate of royalty contained in the lease deed. The matter was referred to the Collector under Clause 21 of the lease, who in his order passed in January, 1968 held that the petitioner was liable to pay royalty at the revised rate of Rs. 2 per tonne. The petitioner then filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that the order of the Collector be quashed and that the Mining Authorities be directed to reassess the royalty according to the rate given in the lease deed.
( 2 )
"before we proceed to set out and examine the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is necessary to notice the relevant statutory provisions. By Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957 the State government has been conferred power to make rules in respect of minor minerals. Sub-section (1) of Section 15 reads as follows:-"
15 (1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official gazette, make rules for regulating the grant of prospecting licences and mining leases in respect of minor minerals and for purposes connected therewith. " in exercise of the powers conferred by the aforesaid provision, the State government made the Madhya Pradesh Minor Minerals Rules, 1961. The Rules define quarry lease to mean a mining lease for minor minerals and provide detailed procedure for the grant of quarry lease in respect of such minerals, Rule 25 of the Rules deals with the conditions of quarry lease. This Rule is divided into three sub-rules. Sub-rule (1) enumerates the conditions which apply to every quarry lease. We are here concerned only with Clause (1) (a) of Sub-rule (1), which reads as follows:-"25 (1) Every quarry lease shall be subject to the following conditions:- (i) (a) The lessee shall pay royalty on minor minerals despatched from the leased areas at the rates specified in the First Schedule. " sub-rule (2) enumerates the conditions which may be included by the Slate government, if deemed necessary, in a quarry lease. Sub-rule (3) does not by itself contain any condition but empowers the State Government to specify any other special condition that may be included in a quarry lease. The rate of royalty for minor minerals is contained in the First Schedule to the rules. Sub-rule (2) of rule 24 enables the State Government to revise the rate of royalty from time to time subject to this limitation that the rate shall not be revised more than once during any period of five years. Rule 24 (2) reads as follows:--"24 (2) The StateGovernment may, by notification in the Official gazette, amend thy First Schedule so as to enhance or reduce the rate at which royalty shall be payable in respect of any minor minerals with effect from such date as may be specified in the notification. Provided that the rate of royalty in respect of any minor mineral sh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.