SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(MP) 164

S.M.N.RAINA, SHIV DAYAL
ANNA SAHEB – Appellant
Versus
TARABAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.Naokar, P.D.GUPTA

S. M. N. RAINA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the husband whose petition for restitution of conjugal rights has been dismissed by the District Judge, Gwalior.

( 2 ) THE petitioner aged about 30 years is a painter by profession. He was married to the respondent on 17-6-49. The parties are Hindus and the marriage was according to the usual Hindu rites. After the marriage the parties lived together in lashkar.

( 3 ) THE case of the petitioner-appellant is that on 15-12-1951 the respondent went away and did not return. He served the respondent with a notice on 7-12-1964 calling upon her to come and live with him but she refused to accept the notice. Thus, according to him the respondent has withdrawn herself, from his society without any reasonable excuse. He, therefore, claimed a decree for restitution of conjugal rights.

( 4 ) THE respondent contested the suit on a number of grounds. She alleged that the marriage was liable to be annulled as she was a minor at the time of her marriage end the consent of her father was obtained by fraud. She further alleged that it was the petitioner, who had deserted her and that he had also treated her with such cruelty as to give rise to an apprehe























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top