SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(MP) 165

SHIV DAYAL, S.M.N.RAINA
NATHURAM ARJUN – Appellant
Versus
SIYASHARAN HARPRASAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.P.Patankar, M.L.GUPTA

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent Appeal from the Judgment of Mr. Justice Pandey.

( 2 ) NATHURAM has a field, Khasra No. 490, at village Mohana in Datia District siyasharan's field. Khasra No. 489, is adjacent to it. Siyasharan made an application before the Tehsildar on the allegation that Nathuram by constructing a bandhiya blocked his way which he had been using for long. This application was decided by the Tehsildar in favour of Siyasharan. The Tehsildar directed Nathuram to remove the obstruction and clear the way within 10 days. Nathuram appealed but did not succeed. Eventually, he filed a suit in the Civil Court for declaration that he is entitled to maintain the Bandhiya and for a declaration that the orders of the Tehsildar and the Revenue Commissioner are inoperative and ineffective. Siyasharan challenged the maintainability of the suit in the Civil Court and urged that it was barred. This objection found favour with the trial Court, the first appellate Court, and also the learned Single Judge in second appeal. However, the learned Single Judge certified the case fit for Letters Patent Appeal. Nathuram has preferred this appeal.

( 3 ) SIYASHARAN's application before the Tehs
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top