SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(MP) 16

SHIV DAYAL, S.M.N.RAINA
FIRM GANESHRAM HARVILAS – Appellant
Versus
RAMCHANDRA RAO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.Naokar, Swami Saran

SHIV DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal has been referred to this Bench in the following circumstances. The respondent brought a suit against the appellants for their ejectment from a non-residential accommodation and for recovery of arrears of rent. It was alleged that the monthly rent was Rs. 45/-as agreed between the parties. The defendant paid rent upto March 30, 1965, but did not pay any rent equivalent Citation: thereafter. The plaintiff served a notice dated December 29, 1965, on the defendants determining the tenancy on January 31, 1966, and to pay arrears of rent, Rs. 540/- from April 1, 1965, to March 31, 1966. This notice was served on defendant No. 2 on December 31, 1965. Since the defendants did not pay arrears of rent within two months of the notice, it was a ground for ejectment. Another ground for ejectment was that the plaintiff needed the suit premises for starting his own business.

( 2 ) ON June 19, 1966, a writ of summons was served on the defendants. On July 16, 1966, that is, within one month of the service of the writ of summons, the defendants deposited Rs. 720/-as arrears of rent. On July 18, 1966, they filed their written statement resisting both the groun





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top