SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(MP) 150

SHIV DAYAL
BABOO NARAYANLAL – Appellant
Versus
MANOHARLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.V.JAKATDAR, Ramkumar

SHIV DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) IN pursuance of my order in Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 410 of 1971, Shri jakatdar, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri R. K. Verma, learned counsel for the respondents, were heard again.

( 2 ) THIS second appeal arises from a suit for a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from raising a wall on his own land and for its demolition in case the defendant erects a wall. The basis of the suit was that the plaintiff had acquired easement of eavesdropping from his house for the statutory period. The defendant resisted the suit. The trial Court found that the plaintiff had acquired a right of easement and passed a decree in favour of the plaintiff restraining the defendant from making any construction in any way so as "to affect the flow of the rain water from the plaintiff's house towards his land in suit". The rest of the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff appealed. The learned Judge of the first appellate Court modified the decree of the trial Court and held that since the plaintiff had a right of easement, the defendant could not make any construction on the land on which the water drops from the plaintiff's eaves. In the resul















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top