SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(MP) 30

S.M.N.RAINA
CHANDRASHEKHAR JAIKISHAN BAJPAI – Appellant
Versus
NIYAMATRAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.G.Apte, K.L.Batham

S. M. N. RAINA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 152 read with Section 151 of the Code of civil Procedure.

( 2 ) THE non-applicant filed a suit against the applicant for eviction on arrears of rent. The suit was decreed by the trial Court, and the decree was maintained in first as well as in second appeal. As eviction was sought under Clause (h) of Subsection (1) of Section 12 of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act. 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') on the ground that the accommodation was required for the purposes of rebuilding the house, the applicant was entitled to the benefit of the provisions of Section 18 of the Act. Section 18, reads as under:--

"18. Recovery of possession for repairs and re-building and re-entry.- (1) In making any order on the grounds specified in Clause (g)or Clause (h) of Sub-section (1) of Section 12, the court shall ascertain from the tenant whether he elects to be placed in occupation of the accommodation or part thereof from which he is to be evicted and, if the tenant so elects, shall record the fact of the election in the order and specify therein the date on or before which he shall deliver possession so as to enable the la









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top