SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(MP) 23

BISHAMBHAR DAYAL, A.P.SEN
RADHIKA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.BAJPAI, P.C.PATHAK

A. P. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition by Radhika Prasad directed against the orders of the Board of revenue, Madhya Pradesh and the revenue authorities subordinate to it rejecting his claim to settlement of khasra No. 194, area 1. 55 acres, situate in village karela, under Section 5 (h) of the M. P. Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are these. During the Chakbandi proceedings of the year 1937, old khasra Nos. 1172/2 and 1195/2, area 1. 55 acres which were then recorded as bagicha, were renumbered as khasra No. 194 and entered as khudkasht as presumably the land had been brought under cultivation. In the subsequent years, the land was apparently allowed to be fallow. So, in the annual papers for the years 1950-51 and onwards, the land was recorded as grass. It was, therefore, treated as having vested in the Stats under Section 4 of the Act.

( 3 ) AFTER a lapse of 16 years from the date of vesting, the petitioner on 13-2-1967. applied to the Sub-Divisional Officer under Section 47 (2) of the M. P. Land revenue Code, 1959, alleging that the land was grove and, therefore, should have been settled with him under Section 5 (h), but had been wrongly reco







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top