SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(MP) 90

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
P. K. Tare, C. J. and M. L. Malik, J.
DINKAR PRABHAKAR MAHAJAN - Appellant
Versus
S.L.AGRAWAL - Respondents
Misc. Petn. 571 Of 1972
Decided On : 08/14/1975

Advocates Appeared:
K.K.ADHIKARI, P.P.Naolekar, R.K.THAKUR

Headnote:(1) Pre-Medical Examination Rules – Rule 9–candidate passing pre-medical test and admitted in the Medical College–no false or incorrect statement made in application–rule not applicable–admission cannot be cancelled.

       (Para 7)

       (2) Natural justice–candidate passing pre-Medical test and admitted to Medical College–before canceling admission show–cause notice should be given.

       (Para 7)

       (3) Estoppel–by negligence–applicability of.

       Where a candidate passes a pre-Medical test and is admitted in the Medical College, he discloses everything in his application and the authorities had full opportunity to scrutinise the application, they are estopped from canceling the admission on the basis of estoppel by negligence. Concluded opinion not given. AIR 1956 Mad. 309, AIR 1966 AP 309 & AIR 1968 SC 716 referred to

       (Para 8 & 9)

M. L. MALIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a hard case. The petitioner, who was prosecuting his studies in the iiird year of the M. B.-B. S. course in the Medical College, Rai-pur received a letter on 16-9-1972 (An-nexure 9) from the Dean that his admission to the m. B. B. S. course had been cancelled because he had not taken Physics as a subject in his B. Sc. (Part I) examination and was, therefore, not qualified to appear in the Pre-medical examination held in the year 1970, to which examination he was wrongly admitted. The petitioner rushed to this Court for a writ of certiorari to quash the letter (Annexure 9) cancelling his admission to the medical courses and expelling him from the College. This Court gave an ad interim writ directing that the petitioner be allowed to prosecute his studies, the results of his M. B. B. S. terms to be declared after the final order in the writ petition was pronounced. The petitioner is now in the Vth year and would shortly be appearing in the final M. B. B. S. examination.

( 2 ) THE petitioner had passed his Higher Secondary School Certificate examination-- A Course (i. e. Three years integrated Regular) in the year 1965 in Second Division. Physics was one of the subjects he had offered. He passed his B. Sc. Part I (Pre-professional) Examination in the year 1967 in Second division. His subjects were Chemistry and Biology. He had not offered Physics as a subject. He passed his B. Sc. Final Examination in the year 1969, subjects being Chemistry and Biology. Physics was not his subject in B. Sc. Part I or in the Final B. Sc. In the year 1970, the petitioner filled in the prescribed form for admission to the Pre-medical Examination. He gave along with the form the requisite certificates and mark-sheets, and wrote a covering letter that his case be considered sympathetically and as a special one.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was admitted to the Examination. He was declared duly passed. The results were notified. He was granted admission to the Medical college, Raipur, and was also awarded scholarship. He passed his M. B. B. S. 1st year, the home-examination, in the year 1971. and his second year which is called the M. B. B. S. First Examination in May, 1972. While prosecuting studies in the Illrd year, he was given the impugned notice,

( 4 ) THE petitioner contends that under the Rules for Pre-medical Examination madhya Pradesh of 1970 (Annexure R-I), the Pre-medical Examination Board which consisted of (i) The Additional Director of Health Services (Medical education) as Chairman (ii) The Deans of Medical Colleges, and (iii) The controller of Pre-medical Examination, was the final authority in the matter of admissions rejections of admissions. Examiners, setters, tabulators, checkers, etc. , and every matter of policy connected therewith. The Board having exercised discretion in admitting the petitioner to the examination and having selected him on his passing the examination, and having notified his selection, the matter of admission stood finally decided which could not be re-agitated years after. That the petitioner had not been dishonest in giving particulars of his academic career and he had filed all the relevant certificates, the scrutiny of which would have revealed that Physics was not his subject in the B. Sc. (Part I)or in the B. Sc. Final Examination. The petitioner had practised no fraud or deception. Instead, by his letter Annexure 6, he had drawn the attention of the controller of the Pre-medical Examination that he had beenapplying for admission during the past three years and being one of a Scheduled Caste, has case could be treated more sympathetically and as a special one and that this was his third attempt that in giving admission, the petitioner was led to believe that whatever disqualification in eligibility he suffered from, was expressly or by implication condoned by the Board. He was allowed to prosecute his studies in the Medical college for more than two years and he did spend lot of his























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top